The Dangers of Non_Empty_Behavior
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Written by Chris Webb   
Monday, 18 March 2013 19:51

Reposted from Chris Webb's blog with the author's permission.

One thing I see quite often when I'm reviewing MDX is the incorrect use of the Non_Empty_Behavior property. 99% of the time it's set without the developer really knowing what it does, and luckily in most cases it makes no difference to performance or what the calculation returns. However. in this post I'm going to argue that you should not use it unless you really know what you're doing and you can prove that it's beneficial - because if it's set incorrectly it can sometimes mean you get incorrect results from your queries.

First of all, what does Non_Empty_Behavior actually do? Basically, it's a hint to the SSAS Formula Engine that says that a calculation will return a null value if a given tuple also returns a null value. Moreover it's a hint that may or may not be ignored. For example, if you had an MDX calculated measure that was defined as

CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[MyMeasure] as [Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]*2;

It would be true to say that this calculated measure would always return a null value when the real measure [Measures].[Internet Sales Amount] returned null, so you would be able to say:

CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[MyMeasure] as [Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]*2
, NON_EMPTY_BEHAVIOR=[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount];

The late, great Mosha covered its use in detail in a number of blog posts from a few years ago:
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/mosha/archive/2006/11/05/budget-variance-a-study-of-mdx-optimizations-evaluation-modes-and-non-empty-behavior.aspx
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/mosha/archive/2007/03/06/averages-ratios-division-by-zero-and-non-empty-behavior.aspx

These posts all refer to SSAS 2005, and from SSAS 2008 onwards a lot of work went on to ensure that most of the scenarios where Non_Empty_Behavior had been necessary to get good performance were optimised away. Certainly, in the simple example I showed above there would be no need to set Non_Empty_Behavior at all - the Formula Engine will already be able to optimise it as much as it can. This means that if you're on SSAS 2005 then Non_Empty_Behavior can be very useful for tuning calculations, but if you are using SSAS 2008 or greater it's highly likely that you do not need to use Non_Empty_Behavior at all. In fact, Mosha's advice back in 2009 when he did a preconference seminar at the PASS Summit on SSAS performance tuning was summed up in these two slides:

image

image

I think the message here is pretty clear.

So, it probably won't help your query performance, but why is it dangerous? Consider the following query:

WITH
MEMBER MEASURES.SomeTest AS
IIF(Now()>0, "Internet", "Reseller")
MEMBER MEASURES.Demo as
STRTOMEMBER("[Measures].[" + measures.sometest + " Sales Amount]")
SELECT
{[Measures].Demo} 
ON 0,
NON EMPTY
[Product].[Category].[Category].members
*
[Date].[Date].[Date].members
ON 1
FROM [Adventure Works]

This returns 1887 rows. However, if I set Non_Empty_Behavior incorrectly, like so:

WITH
MEMBER MEASURES.SomeTest AS
IIF(Now()>0, "Internet", "Reseller")
MEMBER MEASURES.Demo as
STRTOMEMBER("[Measures].[" + measures.sometest + " Sales Amount]")
, NON_EMPTY_BEHAVIOR=[Measures].[Reseller Sales Amount]
SELECT
{[Measures].Demo}
ON 0,
NON EMPTY
[Product].[Category].[Category].members
*
[Date].[Date].[Date].members
ON 1
FROM [Adventure Works]

The query now returns only 64 rows! By saying that the calculation will return a null value when Reseller Sales Amount is null - which is not the case - then rows that do in fact have values will get filtered out by the non empty clause. Clearly this is a bad thing, and also one that may be very hard to see happening when you are testing.

The example above was quite obviously wrong, and in fact it's quite hard on SSAS 2012 to find a query where Non_Empty_Behavior returns incorrect results. More often I see calculations like this:

WITH
MEMBER MEASURES.PreviousSales AS
([Measures].[Internet Sales Amount], [Date].[Calendar].CURRENTMEMBER.PREVMEMBER)
, NON_EMPTY_BEHAVIOR=[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]
SELECT {[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount], measures.PreviousSales} ON 0,
[Date].[Calendar].[Calendar Year].MEMBERS ON 1
FROM [Adventure Works]

.where Non_Empty_Behavior is set incorrectly (the calculation returns the Internet Sales Amount for the previous time period, and it's not true to say that the previous time period's sales will be null if the current time period's sales are null) but the query still returns the correct results. This is because, luckily, Non_Empty_Behavior is being ignored.

So, to sum up, if you are using SSAS 2008 or greater Non_Empty_Behavior may not solve your performance problem and may result in incorrect results. That is not to say that there are still one or two isolated scenarios where it can still be useful. Jorg Klein came across one fairly recently and blogged about it here:
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/jorg_klein/archive/2013/02/18/implement-ssas-md-cell-security-using-dimension-security-with-blazing-performance.aspx

But these scenarios are few and far between. Therefore don't use it if you're not sure what it does!


chris-webb

Chris has been working with Microsoft BI tools since he started using beta 3 of OLAP Services back in the late 90s. Since then he has worked with Analysis Services in a number of roles (including three years spent with Microsoft Consulting Services) and he is now an independent consultant specialising in complex MDX, Analysis Services cube design and Analysis Services query performance problems. His company website can be found at http://www.crossjoin.co.uk and his blog can be found at http://cwebbbi.wordpress.com/ .


 

 

XL Cubed